Combined machine learning–wave propagation approach for monitoring timber mechanical properties under UV aging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study proposes a combined machine learning–wave propagation approach for nondestructive prediction of the modulus of elasticity (MOE) and rupture (MOR) of timber subjected to ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Fir, poplar, alder, and oak wood specimens were subjected to artificial UV aging and assessed using the Lamb wave propagation. Different features including the wave characteristics and the viscoelastic properties of the specimens were obtained from the Lamb wave propagation tests. The extracted features trained a decision tree model for MOE and MOR prediction. The UV radiation caused a decrease in the elastic properties of wood but increased its viscoelasticity. The results also showed a decrease in the wave velocity and an increase in the wave amplitude decay with the UV exposure time. It was revealed that compared with the wave velocity, the wave amplitude decay was better correlated to the MOE of MOR of UV-degraded wood. The MOE and MOR of UV-degraded wood were accurately predicted by the machine learning models fed by the features extracted from the Lamb wave propagation tests, where the shear storage modulus was found as the most important feature for training the models. It was concluded that the proposed approach offers a great tool for in-situ monitoring of wood structures under weathering and photodegradation conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".