MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3135921789 · doi:10.1161/str.52.suppl_1.40

Abstract 40: Hematoma Expansion Shift Analysis to Assess Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage Treatments

2021· article· en· W3135921789 on OpenAlexaff
Vignan Yogendrakumar, Tim Ramsay, Bijoy K. Menon, Adnan I. Qureshi, Jeffrey L. Saver, Dar Dowlatshahi

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Canadian institutionsFoothills Medical CentreUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHematomaIntracerebral hemorrhageQuartileNicardipineMidline shiftStroke (engine)AnesthesiaPopulationSurgeryBlood pressureInternal medicineGlasgow Coma ScaleConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Purpose: In present-day intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) trials, hematoma expansion (HE) is often analyzed as a binary variable - present or absent. However, dichotomizing intrinsically wide-ranging variables discards substantial information reflective of treatment effect and can reduce the ability to detect relationships between the exposure and outcome of interest. We explored the concept of a “HE shift analysis” as a novel analytic mode for ICH treatment trials using previously published clinical trial data. Methods: Using data from the Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage II (ATACH-2) trial, patients were stratified by treatment status (intensive vs. standard blood pressure lowering with IV nicardipine) and HE shift was evaluated by generating strata based on a) previously established HE definitions, b) quartiles of 24-hour total hematoma volume, and c) quartiles of 24-hour total hematoma volume (THV) change. The relationship between blood pressure treatment and hematoma expansion shift was explored using proportional odds models and adjusted Wilcoxon testing. Results: The primary analysis population included 863 patients. In both treatment groups, approximately one-third of patients exhibited no hematoma growth. Using a conventional threshold, significant intraparenchymal expansion (≥33%) was reduced by 5.8% in those assigned to the intensive therapy arm (aOR: 0.77 [95% CI: 0.60-0.99], Figure 1A). The stratified quartiles of 24-hour total hematoma volumes were associated with a 5% shift within the highest and lowest strata in the intensive arm, (aOR: 0.83 [0.66-1.05], Figure 1B). Intensive therapy was associated with a 5.2% reduction from > 3 mL to 0.5-3 mL (aOR: 0.86 [0.68-1.09], Figure 1C). Conclusions: A shift analysis model of HE provides additional insights into the biological effects of a given therapy and may be an alternate way to assess hemostatic agents in future hemorrhage trials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.027
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.140

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0270.039
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStrokeSame topicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchFrench-language works237,207