MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Revealing unknown subglacial carbon processes using high frequency gas measurements and stable isotopes

2020· article· en· W3136001177 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jesper Riis Christiansen, Thomas Röckmann, María Elena Popa, Célia Sapart, Christian Juncher Jørgensen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsotopes of carbonCarbon fibersIsotopeStable isotope ratioEarth scienceEnvironmental scienceGeologyComputer sciencePhysicsNuclear physicsAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ice sheets and glaciers play an important role for the global carbon cycle through the exchange of their subglacial carbon with the proglacial aquatic environment and the atmosphere in the form of CH4 and CO2. However, the subglacial environment below ice sheets and glaciers is largely inaccessible from the surface and hence we know very little about the carbon turnover processes in these extreme habitats that lead to this carbon export. Biological CH4 production and oxidation has been found in subglacial sediments across Canada, Antarctica, west Greenland and at the center of the Greenland Ice sheet. This points at a common glacial process for gaseous CH4 and CO2 emissions, but this knowledge is backed by very few direct field observations from two locations in Greenland and one in Iceland. The lack of field based studies is the single most-limiting factor for increasing our understanding of the magnitude and extent of subglacial carbon emission to the atmosphere and its relevance for the global carbon budget. We present new field measurements suggesting that it is possible to quantify the carbon turnover processes in the subglacial environment using high frequency concentration measurements and stable isotope composition of CH4 and CO2 in gaseous and dissolved form sampled at a subglacial meltwater outlet. During three field campaigns in the early, mid and late melt season in 2018 and 2019 we measured significantly elevated CH4 and CO2 concentrations in the air and water exiting a subglacial cave system. We devised a field sampling program for retrieval of discrete gas and water samples that allow identification of the original (common) source of the gaseous and dissolved CH4 and CO2 by quantifying the d13C and dH signature of the source. Our field measurements are amongst the first to directly quantify the emission of CH4 and CO2 to the atmosphere and our isotopic investigations clearly show a biological source of CH4 and its oxidation to CO2 in the subglacial environment and point to a hydrological control on the release of both CH4 and CO2. These types of data are instrumental to improve the understanding of subglacial carbon processes and design future field investigations to assess its climatic relevance and to narrow the uncertainty of emission estimates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryospheric studies and observations→French-language works237,207→