5 EDIFÍCIOS DE OSCAR NIEMEYER – CENTRO HISTÓRICO DE SÃO PAULO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oscar Niemeyer ( Rio de Janeiro , 15 de dezembro de 1907 – Rio de Janeiro , 5 de dezembro de 2012 ) foi um arquiteto muito importante pelo desenvolvimento da arquitetura moderna e suas obras sao muito conhecidas em todo o Brasil e no mundo. Vinculado as ideias do arquiteto frances Le Corbusier, e com contribuicoes de Lucio Costa em projetos, o arquiteto carioca fez edificacoes no pais que sao inspiradoras para muitos. Entre elas, as elevacoes que foram construidas no Centro Historico de Sao Paulo, pelo cliente, Banco Nacional Imobiliario. O tema de pesquisa e sobre o conjunto de cinco edificios presentes no anel central: O Edificio Copan, Ed. Montreal, Ed. Eiffel, Ed. Triângulo, e por ultimo o Ed. e Galeria California. Todos projetadas por Niemeyer, com algumas participacoes de outros, entre eles, Lucio Costa, durante a decada de 50, periodo em que o processo de modernizacao foi intenso em Sao Paulo. Esta pesquisa examina como o arquiteto Oscar Niemeyer, com suas idealidades modernas e de desenhos livres, adaptou seu trabalho ao intenso mercado imobiliario da metropole em expansao, Sao Paulo; e as implantacoes destes edificios em funcao da legislacao urbana da epoca, criada a 20 anos antes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".