Fate of a bulge in an inflated hyperelastic tube: theory and experiment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mechanical instability in a pre-tensioned finite hyperelastic tube subjected to a slowly increasing internal pressure produces a spatially localized bulge at a critical pressure. This instability is studied in controlled experiments on inflated latex rubber tubes, from the perspective of buckling observed in aneurysms and their rupture risk. The fate of the bulge under continued inflation is governed by the end-conditions and the initial tension in the tube. In a tube with one end fixed and a weight attached to the other freely moving end, the bulge propagates axially at low initial tension, growing in length, and the tube relaxes by extension without buckling. Rupture occurs when the tension is high. By contrast, the bulge formed in an initially stretched tube held fixed at both its ends can buckle or rupture, depending on the amount of initial tension. Experiments are reported for different initial tensions and boundary conditions (BCs). Failure maps in the stretch parameter space and in stretch–tension space are constructed by extending existing theories for bulge formation and buckling analyses to the experimentally relevant BCs. Failure maps deduced from the theory are compared against experiments, and the underlying assumptions are critically assessed. Experiments reveal that buckling provides an alternative route to relieve the stress built up during inflation. Hence, buckling, when it occurs, can be a protective fail-safe mechanism against the rupture of a bulge in an inflated elastic tube.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".