The Relationship Between the Functional Gait Assessment and Quality-of-Life Data in Patients Undergoing Vestibular Schwannoma Resection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between the Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) and quality of life (QOL) measurements relating to balance before and after vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection and to assess the role of preoperative FGA in predicting postoperative QOL. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective clinical study of adult patients undergoing VS resection between September 2018 and December 2019. FGA was administered 1 week before and after surgery. Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) and Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality of Life (PANQOL) were administered preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively. SETTING: Single tertiary center. PATIENTS: Patients (age ≥ 18 years old) with VS undergoing microsurgical resection. Excluded were patient with previous surgery or radiation. INTERVENTION: VS resection. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcome: correlation between FGA and QOL surveys. Secondary outcome: correlation between preoperative measurements of balance and postoperative PANQOL. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-eight patients were analyzed (mean age: 48 years old, 65.9% female). The translabyrinthine approach was most commonly performed. Under multivariate analysis, preoperative FGA significantly correlated with preoperative PANQOL balance score (p < 0.0001), preoperative PANQOL total score (p = 0.0002), and preoperative DHI (p < 0.0001). However, postoperative FGA did not significantly correlate with postoperative PANQOL balance or total scores (p = 0.446 and p = 0.4, respectively), or postoperative DHI (p = 0.3). Univariate analysis demonstrated that preoperative DHI and preoperative FGA were predictive of changes in postoperative PANQOL balance and total scores. However under multivariate analysis, preoperative FGA did not predict changes in postoperative PANQOL balance or total score (p = 0.24; p = 0.28, respectively). Preoperative DHI remained predictive of changes in postoperative PANQOL balance (p = 0.03) score but not of postoperative PANQOL total score (p = 0.37). CONCLUSIONS: Although FGA and QOL data significantly correlated in the preoperative setting, our results did not suggest that preoperative FGA can be used to determine postoperative QOL. Additionally, the lack of correlation between FGA and QOL measurements in the acute postoperative setting suggests that further research is needed to determine contributors to postoperative QOL.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".