Interplay between London Dispersion, Hubbard <i>U</i>, and Metastable States for Uranium Compounds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High-throughput computational studies of lanthanide and actinide chemistry with density-functional theory are complicated by the need for Hubbard U corrections, which ensure localization of the f-electrons, but can lead to metastable states. This work presents a systematic investigation of the effects of both Hubbard U value and metastable states on the predicted structural and thermodynamic properties of four uranium compounds central to the field of nuclear fuels: UC, UN, UO 2, and UCl 3 . We also assess the impact of the exchange-hole dipole moment (XDM) dispersion correction on the computed properties. Overall, the choice of Hubbard U value and inclusion of a dispersion correction cause larger variations in the computed geometric properties than result from metastable states. The weak dependence of structure optimization on metastable states should simplify future high-throughput calculations on actinides. Conversely, addition of the dispersion correction is found to offset the repulsion introduced by the Hubbard U term and provides greatly improved agreement with experiment for both cell volumes and heats of formation. The XDM dispersion correction is largely invariant to the chosen U value, making it a robust dispersion correction for actinide systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".