MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3136332804 · doi:10.18280/acsm.450107

Effect of Friction Stir Process Parameters on Mechanical Properties of Al/Eggshell/SiC Composite Material

2021· article· en· W3136332804 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Anas Islam, Vijay Kumar Dwivedi, Shashi Prakash Dwivedi

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales de Chimie Science des Matériaux · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAluminum Alloys Composites Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceUltimate tensile strengthComposite numberAluminiumComposite materialRotational speedFriction stir processingIndentation hardnessBall millMetallurgyMicrostructureMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rise in pollution is a serious matter of concern for all nations. Industries are mainly responsible for damaging the balance of the cycle of pollution. In this paper, the mechanical properties of Aluminum have been enhanced by reinforcing it with eggshell wastes and SiC as reinforcement particles. Ball-milling technique has been applied for up to 75 hours for making the densities of Aluminum, Eggshell and SiC equal. The prime focus of this work is to improve the hardness value of Aluminium-based final composite material. Friction Stir Process (FSP) technique has been used to develop the composite and the driving parameters of FSP like rotational speed, transverse speed etc. are optimized with the help of the Box-Behnken Design approach. The optimized value of rotation speed was 966.14 rpm as well as transverse speed was 23.18 mm/min. Hardness and tensile strength of composite developed at an optimum combination of parameters were found to be 72.2 BHN and 194.48 MPa respectively. Results showed that tensile strength and hardness were enhanced by about 44.05% and 64.09% respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.761

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales de Chimie Science des MatériauxSame topicAluminum Alloys Composites PropertiesFrench-language works237,207