MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3136347977 · doi:10.1142/s0219199721500164

The symplectic structure for renormalization of circle diffeomorphisms with breaks

2021· article· en· W3136347977 on OpenAlexaff
Selim Ghazouani, Konstantin Khanin

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in Contemporary Mathematics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical Dynamics and Fractals
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSymplectic geometryMathematicsIterated functionInvariant (physics)SymplectomorphismPure mathematicsRenormalizationMoment mapSymplectic groupSymplectic representationAction (physics)TorusMathematical physicsMathematical analysisGeometryPhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main goal of this paper is to reveal the symplectic structure related to renormalization of circle maps with breaks. We first show that iterated renormalizations of [Formula: see text] circle diffeomorphisms with [Formula: see text] breaks, [Formula: see text], with given size of breaks, converge to an invariant family of piecewise Möbius maps, of dimension [Formula: see text]. We prove that this invariant family identifies with a relative character variety [Formula: see text] where [Formula: see text] is a [Formula: see text]-holed torus, and that the renormalization operator identifies with a sub-action of the mapping class group [Formula: see text]. This action allows us to introduce the symplectic form which is preserved by renormalization. The invariant symplectic form is related to the symplectic form described by Guruprasad et al. [Group systems, groupoids, and moduli spaces of parabolic bundles, Duke Math. J. 89(2) (1997) 377–412], and goes back to the earlier work by Goldman [The symplectic nature of fundamental groups of surfaces, Adv. Math. 54(2) (1984) 200–225]. To the best of our knowledge the connection between renormalization in the nonlinear setting and symplectic dynamics had not been brought to light yet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.115
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications in Contemporary MathematicsSame topicMathematical Dynamics and FractalsFrench-language works237,207