Acoustic modes of locally resonant phononic crystals: Comparison with frequency-dependent mass models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Locally resonant acoustic materials were proposed to control sound using structures with feature size orders of magnitude smaller than the acoustic wavelength in air. We analytically derive the effective, frequency-dependent mass densities of resonant oscillators consisting of a heavy mass within a light shell, embedded in foam, in two dimensions, using a rigid core-shell approximation. The effective mass is expressible in closed form by elementary functions, enabling a mapping of the low-frequency physics to a simple one-dimensional model involving a point mass harmonically coupled within a box. The acoustic band structure of a two-dimensional square lattice of these oscillators is evaluated in the effective, frequency-dependent mass density model and compared with the exact solution. For the out-of-plane oscillation within this two-dimensional phononic crystal, the nonlinear eigenvalue equation resulting from the frequency-dependent density is solved with the Cutting Surface Method to yield the acoustic band structure. This agrees with the exact band structure obtained by finite element method calculations within $2%$ numerical error. For the in-plane oscillations involving internal translations or rotations within the core-shell resonators, the one-dimensional mass-in-a-box model recaptures the exact acoustic modes at only certain high-symmetry points of the two-dimensional Brillouin zone. The description of more complex resonances within acoustic metamaterials requires a fundamental generalization of current effective mass models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".