MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3136708589 · doi:10.1128/aem.02704-20

Role of Phylogenetic Structure in the Dynamics of Coastal Viral Assemblages

2021· article· en· W3136708589 on OpenAlexafffund
Julia Gustavsen, Curtis A. Suttle

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied and Environmental Microbiology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicBacteriophages and microbial interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersBritish Columbia Knowledge Development FundMinistry of Technology, Innovation and Citizens' ServicesCanada Foundation for InnovationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of Canada
KeywordsPhylogenetic treeBiologyPhylogeneticsEcologyEvolutionary biologyGeographyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Viruses are major agents of microbial mortality in marine systems, yet little is known about changes in the composition of viral assemblages in relation to those of the microbial communities that they infect. Here, we sampled coastal seawater every 2 weeks for 1 year and used high-throughput sequencing of marker genes to follow changes in the composition of two groups of ecologically important viruses, as well as the communities of bacteria and protists that serve as their respective hosts. Different subsets of genetically related viruses dominated at different times. These results demonstrate that although the genetic composition of viral assemblages is highly dynamic temporally, for the most part the shuffling of genotypes occurs within a few clusters of phylogenetically related viruses. Thus, it appears that even in temperate coastal waters with large seasonal changes, the highly dynamic shuffling of viral genotypes occurs largely within a few subsets of related individuals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied and Environmental MicrobiologySame topicBacteriophages and microbial interactionsFrench-language works237,207