Undetected but widespread: the cryptic invasion of non-native cattail (Typha spp.) in a Pacific Northwest estuary
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Early detection of invasive species is an important predictor of management success. Non-native narrow-leaved cattail ( Typha angustifolia ) has been detected in the Fraser River Estuary (FRE) in recent decades, but questions around their degree of establishment, and the potential emergence of hybrid cattail ( Typha x glauca ), remain unanswered. This study models the current and potential future distribution of non-native cattails in the FRE using a unique combination of spectral imagery analysis and species distribution modelling. Contrary to our expectation, we find that non-native cattails are already widespread, currently occupying approximately 4% of FRE tidal marshes. Though never formally recorded in the FRE, hybrid cattail is the more abundant of the two taxa, suggesting that heterosis may be facilitating this invasion. In our species distribution model, we distinguish between site suitability (ability to establish and persist) and site susceptibility (risk of being colonized when suitable). Our model predicts that 28% of the estuary has > 50% probability of suitability, and 21% has > 50% probability of susceptibility to non-native Typha , indicating the scale of this invasion may increase over time. Restoration projects had proportionally more cattail, susceptible habitat, and suitable habitat than the overall estuary, casting doubt on their effectiveness at mitigating wetland destruction. Due to their resemblance to native Typha latifolia , these cattails qualify as cryptic invaders, which explains how they were able to establish and remain undetected for decades. Regional eradication is unlikely given the extent of invasion, therefore management should prioritize areas of high conservation and cultural values.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".