Morphological Based Method for Automated Extraction and Classification of ECG ST-T Wave
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The wave starting from the beginning of the S wave until the end of the T wave is known as ST-T. ST-T wave extraction and classification is a very important technique in the diagnosis of myocardial ischemia. The myocardial ischemia which is also called cardiac ischemia can cause damage to the heart muscle. A sudden, severe blockage of a coronary artery may lead to a heart attack or other severe complications, and may also cause serious abnormal heart rhythms which will be reflected in the electrocardiogram trace. This paper aims to automate the real-time technique detection of ST-T waves that help in the diagnosis of myocardial ischemia and to classify the patient state. The proposed method uses the ECG wave morphological features that have been extracted using the detrended cumulative area, which is used to detect the ST-T wave. The proposed technique was tested and validated and it revealed promising results. The proposed method scored a sensitivity of 90.13% for K-mean Clustering and 96.3% for the SVM classifier for the ST interval detection. The method was tested on the European ST-T Database.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".