Genomic diversity and <scp>CRISPR‐Cas</scp> systems in the cyanobacterium <i>Nostoc</i> in the High Arctic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nostoc (Nostocales, Cyanobacteria) has a global distribution in the Polar Regions. However, the genomic diversity of Nostoc is little known and there are no genomes available for polar Nostoc. Here we carried out the first genomic analysis of the Nostoc commune morphotype with a recent sample from the High Arctic and a herbarium specimen collected during the British Arctic Expedition (1875-76). Comparisons of the polar genomes with 26 present-day non-polar members of the Nostocales family highlighted that there are pronounced genetic variations among Nostoc strains and species. Osmoprotection and other stress genes were found in all Nostoc strains, but the two Arctic strains had markedly higher numbers of biosynthetic gene clusters for uncharacterised non-ribosomal peptide synthetases, suggesting a high diversity of secondary metabolites. Since viral-host interactions contribute to microbial diversity, we analysed the CRISPR-Cas systems in the Arctic and two temperate Nostoc species. There were a large number of unique repeat-spacer arrays in each genome, indicating diverse histories of viral attack. All Nostoc strains had a subtype I-D system, but the polar specimens also showed evidence of a subtype I-B system that has not been previously reported in cyanobacteria, suggesting diverse cyanobacteria-virus interactions in the Arctic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".