MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3136872319 · doi:10.1002/chem.202100922

Quantitative Structure‐Property Relationship Modelling for the Prediction of Singlet Oxygen Generation by Heavy‐Atom‐Free BODIPY Photosensitizers**

2021· article· en· W3136872319 on OpenAlexaff
Andrey A. Buglak, Asterios Charisiadis, Aimee Sheehan, Christopher J. Kingsbury, Mathias O. Senge, Mikhail A. Filatov

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry - A European Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
FundersH2020 Future and Emerging TechnologiesTechnological University DublinTechnische Universität MünchenEuropean Commission
KeywordsSinglet oxygenBODIPYPhotodynamic therapyPhotochemistryOxygen atomAtom (system on chip)ChemistryProperty (philosophy)OxygenComputer scienceOrganic chemistryMoleculePhysicsOpticsFluorescence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Heavy‐atom‐free sensitizers forming long‐living triplet excited states via the spin‐orbit charge transfer intersystem crossing (SOCT‐ISC) process have recently attracted attention due to their potential to replace costly transition metal complexes in photonic applications. The efficiency of SOCT‐ISC in BODIPY donor‐acceptor dyads, so far the most thoroughly investigated class of such sensitizers, can be finely tuned by structural modification. However, predicting the triplet state yields and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation quantum yields for such compounds in a particular solvent is still very challenging due to a lack of established quantitative structure‐property relationship (QSPR) models. In this work, the available data on singlet oxygen generation quantum yields (Φ Δ ) for a dataset containing >70 heavy‐atom‐free BODIPY in three different solvents (toluene, acetonitrile, and tetrahydrofuran) were analyzed. In order to build reliable QSPR model, a series of new BODIPYs were synthesized that bear different electron donating aryl groups in the meso position, their optical and structural properties were studied along with the solvent dependence of singlet oxygen generation, which confirmed the formation of triplet states via the SOCT‐ISC mechanism. For the combined dataset of BODIPY structures, a total of more than 5000 quantum‐chemical descriptors was calculated including quantum‐chemical descriptors using density functional theory (DFT), namely M06‐2X functional. QSPR models predicting ΦΔ values were developed using multiple linear regression (MLR), which perform significantly better than other machine learning methods and show sufficient statistical parameters (R=0.88–0.91 and q 2 =0.62–0.69) for all three solvents. A small root mean squared error of 8.2 % was obtained for Φ Δ values predicted using MLR model in toluene. As a result, we proved that QSPR and machine learning techniques can be useful for predicting ΦΔ values in different media and virtual screening of new heavy‐atom‐free BODIPYs with improved photosensitizing ability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.447
Threshold uncertainty score0.490

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations65
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistry - A European JournalSame topicNanoplatforms for cancer theranosticsFrench-language works237,207