MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3136885662 · doi:10.1161/str.52.suppl_1.p67

Abstract P67: Role of Genetic Variants in Predicting Cognitive Outcomes Following Small Vessel Ischemic Stroke

2021· article· en· W3136885662 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wayneho Kam, Larry B. Goldstein, Alec McConnell, Hussein R. Al‐Khalidi, Ellen Bennett, Carol A. Colton, Cheryl Bushnell, Deborah K. Attix, Nada K El Husseini

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and genetic disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStroke (engine)Internal medicineMontreal Cognitive AssessmentCohortCognitionCognitive declineRetrospective cohort studyDementiaDiseasePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: About 20% of patients with small vessel ischemic stroke (SVS) have cognitive impairment; however, the role of genetic factors in predicting cognitive outcomes following SVS has not been fully explored. APOE and ABCC9 have been associated with Alzheimer’s disease and hippocampal sclerosis respectively and play an important role in the neurovascular unit. We evaluated whether allelic variants in these genes influence cognitive outcomes following SVS. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort of patients enrolled in the ASA-Bugher Small Vessel Intracranial Disease Whole Genome Association Studies. Patients with SVS were categorized by APOE (presence or absence of ε4 allele) and ABCC9 SNP rs704180 (presence or absence of A allele) status. The primary outcomes were total score on the short form of the MoCA, which assesses global cognition, and time to complete Trails B, which is a measure of executive function that can be affected by stroke. Linear regression analyses were performed using the genetic exposures of interest, adjusting for age, education, sex, race/ethnicity, NIHSS score, burden of white matter disease (WMD; using the CHS validated score 0-9), and time between stroke and the cognitive assessment. Results: The sample included 145 patients who had SVS and available APOE and ABCC9 data. Among this cohort, 51.4% were men and 27.6% African American. The median age of the study participants was 63.4 years, the median years of education was 12, the median NIHSS was 2, and the median WMD burden score was 2. The mean time between stroke and the cognitive assessment was 75 days. The APOE ε4 allele was present in 35.0% and ABCC9 A allele in 74.8%. The presence of APOE ε4 allele was not associated with post-stroke MoCA scores (p=0.31) or Trails B (p=0.86). ABCC9 A allele was also not associated with post-stroke MoCA scores (p=0.34) or Trails B (p=0.31). Older age, higher NIHSS score, and greater burden of WMD were independently associated with longer times to complete Trails B (p<0.0001), but not with the MoCA score. Conclusion: Following SVS, several patient characteristics, including age, stroke severity, and WMD burden, rather than their APOE and ABCC9 allelic statuses, were associated with post-stroke measures of executive function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStrokeSame topicCerebrovascular and genetic disordersFrench-language works237,207