MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3136892902 · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac20df

A Constraint on Primordial B-modes from the First Flight of the Spider Balloon-borne Telescope

2022· article· en· W3136892902 on OpenAlexafffund
P. A. R. Ade, M. Amiri, Steven J. Benton, A. S. Bergman, R. Bihary, J. J. Bock, J. Richard Bond, J. A. Bonetti, Sean Bryan, H. C. Chiang, Carlo Contaldi, Olivier Doré, Adriaan J. Duivenvoorden, H. K. Eriksen, M. Farhang, J. P. Filippini, A. A. Fraisse, Katherine Freese, M. Galloway, A. E. Gambrel, N. N. Gandilo, K. Ganga, R. Gualtieri, Jon E. Gudmundsson, M. Halpern, John W. Hartley, M. Hasselfield, G. C. Hilton, W. Holmes, V. V. Hristov, Zhiqi Huang, K. D. Irwin, W. C. Jones, A. Karakci, C. L. Kuo, Z. Kermish, Jason S.-Y. Leung, Lun Li, D. S. Y. Mak, P. Mason, K. Megerian, Lorenzo Moncelsi, T. A. Morford, Johanna M. Nagy, C. B. Netterfield, M. R. Nolta, R. O’Brient, B. Osherson, Ivan L. Padilla, B. Racine, A. Rahlin, C. Reintsema, J. E. Ruhl, M. C. Runyan, T. M. Ruud, J. A. Shariff, E. C. Shaw, C. Shiu, J. D. Soler, Xue Song, A. Trangsrud, C. Tucker, R. S. Tucker, A. D. Turner, J. F. van der List, A. C. Weber, I. K. Wehus, S. Wen, Donald Wiebe, E. Y. Young

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of TorontoMcGill UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
FundersFermilabBritish Antarctic SurveyBritish Columbia Knowledge Development FundOffice of ScienceNorges ForskningsrådScience and Technology Facilities CouncilUniversity of TorontoCanadian Space AgencyInyuvesi Yakwazulu-NataliUK Research and InnovationNational Science FoundationCompute CanadaDavid and Lucile Packard FoundationUniversity of Texas at AustinU.S. Department of EnergyPrinceton UniversityScience Mission DirectorateGovernment of OntarioNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationVetenskapsrådet
KeywordsPhysicsCosmic microwave backgroundPlanckAstrophysicsSpectral densityCosmic background radiationPolarization (electrochemistry)AstronomyAnisotropyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present the first linear polarization measurements from the 2015 long-duration balloon flight of Spider , which is an experiment that is designed to map the polarization of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) on degree angular scales. The results from these measurements include maps and angular power spectra from observations of 4.8% of the sky at 95 and 150 GHz, along with the results of internal consistency tests on these data. While the polarized CMB anisotropy from primordial density perturbations is the dominant signal in this region of sky, Galactic dust emission is also detected with high significance. Galactic synchrotron emission is found to be negligible in the Spider bands. We employ two independent foreground-removal techniques to explore the sensitivity of the cosmological result to the assumptions made by each. The primary method uses a dust template derived from Planck data to subtract the Galactic dust signal. A second approach, which constitutes a joint analysis of Spider and Planck data in the harmonic domain, assumes a modified-blackbody model for the spectral energy distribution of the dust with no constraint on its spatial morphology. Using a likelihood that jointly samples the template amplitude and r parameter space, we derive 95% upper limits on the primordial tensor-to-scalar ratio from Feldman–Cousins and Bayesian constructions, finding r < 0.11 and r < 0.19, respectively. Roughly half the uncertainty in r derives from noise associated with the template subtraction. New data at 280 GHz from Spider ’s second flight will complement the Planck polarization maps, providing powerful measurements of the polarized Galactic dust emission.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.270
Threshold uncertainty score0.936

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations63
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesFrench-language works237,207