MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3137055493 · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abef65

The GBT Diffuse Ionized Gas Survey (GDIGS): Survey Overview and First Data Release

2021· article· en· W3137055493 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGalactic planeIonizationSpectral resolutionLine (geometry)Noise (video)Spectral lineTelescopeGreen Bank TelescopeElectron density

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Green Bank Telescope (GBT) Diffuse Ionized Gas Survey (GDIGS) traces ionized gas in the Galactic midplane by measuring 4–8 GHz radio recombination line (RRL) emission. The nominal survey zone is 32.°3 > ℓ > − 5°, ∣b∣ < 0.°5, but coverage extends above and below the plane in select fields and additionally includes the areas around W47 (ℓ ≃ 37.°5) and W49 (ℓ ≃ 43°). GDIGS simultaneously observes 22 Hnα (15 usable), 25 Hnβ (18 usable), and 8 Hnγ RRLs (all usable), as well as multiple molecular line transitions (including those of , H2CO, and CH3OH). Here, we describe the GDIGS survey parameters and characterize the RRL data, focusing primarily on the Hnα data. We produce sensitive data cubes by averaging the usable RRLs, after first smoothing to a common spectral resolution of 0.5 km s−1 and a spatial resolution of 2.′65 for Hnα, 2.′62 for Hnβ, and 2.′09 for Hnγ. The average spectral noise per spaxel in the Hnα data cubes is ∼10 mK (∼5 mJy beam−1). This sensitivity allows GDIGS to detect RRLs from plasma throughout the inner Galaxy. The GDIGS Hnα data are sensitive to emission measures EM ≳ 1100 cm−6 pc, which corresponds to a mean electron density 〈n e 〉 ≳ 30 cm−3 for a 1 pc path length or 〈n e 〉 ≳ 1 cm−3 for a 1 kpc path length.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.111

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement SeriesSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207