MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3137078388 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.083509

Constraints on <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>CDM</mml:mi></mml:math> extensions from the SPT-3G 2018 <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math> power spectra

2021· article· lv· W3137078388 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2021
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of TorontoThree-Speed Logic (Canada)Canadian Institute for Advanced ResearchMcGill University
FundersFermilabHigh Energy PhysicsAustralian Research CouncilScience and Technology Facilities CouncilKavli Institute for Cosmological Physics, University of ChicagoUniversity of Colorado BoulderOffice of ScienceFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesUniversity of MelbourneNational Energy Research Scientific Computing CenterMcGill UniversityUniversity of ChicagoKavli FoundationCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesArgonne National LaboratoryU.S. Department of EnergyGordon and Betty Moore FoundationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlfred P. Sloan FoundationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsSpectral lineCosmic microwave backgroundConstraint (computer-aided design)Set (abstract data type)Power (physics)Data setSpectral density

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors present constraints on cosmological models obtained by using state-of-the-art methods on data from the South Pole Telescope (SPT-3G) experiment. Apart from several incremental improvements, the results are in general consistent with those obtained from other data sets and other experiments. In particular, the authors set the tightest constraint on the Hubble constant, ${H}_{0}$, from CMB power spectra to date, which is in $4.1\ensuremath{\sigma}$ tension with the most precise distance-ladder-based measurement of ${H}_{0}$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.901
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.007
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0050.005
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations85
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.Same topicCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesFrench-language works237,207