Bibliographic record
Abstract
"Easter in the Maramureş folklore Based on direct field investigations, our research is meant to investigate the repertoire rich in traditions, customs, beliefs and superstitions, most of which make up the pre-Christian background of this religious feast day. We dedicated the first part to the preparatory acts of this feast day, giving priority to important traditions and customs due to their age: ritual sweeping, ritual lamb sacrifice, the Holy Thursday custom “piezărit”, and then to broadly approach the eggs’ painting and decorating. Following the fusion of the repertoire of pre-Christian and Christian traditions, we dedicated due space to the use of red and decorated eggs in the feast day ceremony, and we also reserved an extended space for the traditions of using eggshells and egg-reddening legends. We have permanently paid attention to pre-Christian customs performed on this feast day, such as ritual fires, customs and traditions related to the cult of the dead. We have extensively approached the custom of the Easter forefathers, in the Land of Lăpuş, which is individualized as compared to other country areas by its novelty, complexity and ethnographic elements, at Easter taking place during two days. I have reviewed the rich repertoire of beliefs and superstitions and I have treated traditions related to premonitions and folk medicine. In our research, we have dedicated an extended space to customs and traditions that take place on the second day of this religious feast day, completing its rich pre-Christian background: girls’ watering, boys’ dance, but the emphasis falls on the custom of celebrating the most diligent housekeeper, the first one to plow, in the versions from Şurdeşti and Cufoaia, which include sequences with unique ceremonial acts and rituals. Keywords: Easter eggs, Maramureș, feast day ceremony, customs "
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".