Behaviour of the Monotone Single Index Model Under Repeated Measurements
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The generalized linear model is an important method in the statistical toolkit. The isotonic single index model can be thought of as a further generalization whereby the link function is assumed to be monotone non-decreasing as opposed to known and fixed. Such a shape constraint is quite natural in many statistical problems, and is fulfilled by the usual generalized linear models. In this paper we consider inference in this model in the setting where repeated measurements of predictor values and associated responses are observed. This setting is encountered in medical studies and is very different from the one considered in the classical monotone single index model studied in the literature. Here, we use nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation to infer the unknown regression vector and link function. We present a detailed study of finite and asymptotic properties of this estimator and propose goodness-of-fit tests for the model. Through an extended simulation study, we show that the model has competitive predictive performance. We illustrate our estimation approach using a Leukemia data set.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it