Dysregulated Gene Expression of Imprinted and X-Linked Genes: A Link to Poor Development of Bovine Haploid Androgenetic Embryos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mammalian uniparental embryos are efficient models for genome imprinting research and allow studies on the contribution of the paternal and maternal genomes to early embryonic development. In this study, we analyzed different methods for production of bovine haploid androgenetic embryos (hAE) to elucidate the causes behind their poor developmental potential. Results indicate that hAE can be efficiently generated by using intracytoplasmic sperm injection and oocyte enucleation at telophase II. Although androgenetic haploidy does not disturb early development up to around the 8-cell stage, androgenetic development is disturbed after the time of zygote genome activation and hAE that reach the morula stage are less capable to reach the blastocyst stage of development. Karyotypic comparisons to parthenogenetic- and ICSI-derived embryos excluded chromosomal segregation errors as causes of the developmental constraints of hAE. However, analysis of gene expression indicated abnormal levels of transcripts for key long non-coding RNAs involved in X chromosome inactivation and genomic imprinting of the KCNQ1 locus, suggesting an association with X chromosome and some imprinted loci. Moreover, transcript levels of methyltransferase 3B were significantly downregulated, suggesting potential anomalies in hAE establishing de novo methylation. Finally, the methylation status of imprinted control regions for XIST and KCNQ1OT1 genes remained hypomethylated in hAE at the morula and blastocyst stages, confirming their origin from spermatozoa. Thus, our results exclude micromanipulation and chromosomal abnormalities as major factors disturbing the normal development of bovine haploid androgenotes. In addition, although the cause of the arrest remains unclear, we have shown that the inefficient development of haploid androgenetic bovine embryos to develop to the blastocyst stage is associated with abnormal expression of key factors involved in X chromosome activity and genomic imprinting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".