MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3137425698 · doi:10.1353/tfr.2013.0153

La révélation inachevée: le personnage à l’épreuve de la vérité romanesque par Yannick Roy

2013· article· fr· W3137425698 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Laurence M. Porter

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œFrench review · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCensorshipReading (process)Section (typography)Value (mathematics)Product (mathematics)PublishingDebtArtHumanitiesArt historyClassicsHistoryLiteratureLawPolitical scienceAdvertisingBusinessComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Naturally, the major issue concerning this concept is whether the book in question possesses real quality or is merely a flash in the pan. Equally naturally, bestselling authors proclaim the value of their product while their less successful brethren beg to differ. Yet what complicates the matter is that the Bible is the alltime best-seller followed by the works of William Shakespeare, and probably few would be prepared to dismiss their authors as lightweights. As Rouvillois demonstrates, the history of the best-seller is the history of modern literary marketing, with significant roles being played by media-savvy publishers (Grasset, Gallimard) capable of expanding the concept to include long-sellers (how many weeks on the best-seller list), and late-sellers (author dead, but book sales thriving), and in France at least, able to work the prize committees . The Book of the Month Club, founded in 1926, started out slowly but rapidly became a breeding ground for best-sellers, as have been its contemporary avatars, Apostrophes and Oprah. These television shows have proven to be such a gold mine for the publishing industry that when the Germans created one, Lesen (Reading), a wag suggested that a more appropriate title would have been Kaufen (Buying). Finally, in terms of marketing tools, the paperback revolution has given a second life to novels that were already successful in their hardbound version. Rouvillois has an interesting section on censorship and its potential for stimulating sales. Certainly Boris Vian owed a debt of gratitude to “le président d’une ligue de vertu, le Cartel d’action morale et sociale” (164) for trying to get J’irai cracher sur vos tombes banned. Government disapproval turned Béranger into a major poet, and Henry Miller had to be grateful for the protests against Tropic of Capricorn. Of all the virtues of Une histoire, its greatest may be that it does not have a thesis. As Rouvillois makes clear, the history of the best-seller is replete with contradictions , endless arguments over what the word means, and bizarre facts. Who would have known, for instance, that Les misérables was extremely popular among the soldiers of the Confederacy? To the extent there can be any central idea about the history of the best-seller, Gaston Gallimard came closest to expressing it, “On ne sait jamais rien du sort d’un livre” (281). Rouvillois’s study attests to the truth of this statement. Florida State University William Cloonan ROY, YANNICK. La révélation inachevée: le personnage à l’épreuve de la vérité romanesque. Montréal: PU de Montréal, 2011. ISBN 978-2-7606-2289-9. Pp. 284. $34,95 Can. This ground-breaking study seeks to redefine the novel flexibly, as occupying varying points along a continuum whose extremes René Girard memorably characterized as ‘Mensonge romantique’ and ‘Vérité romanesque.’ Roy argues that Girard’s rigidly doctrinaire approach condemns the Romantic sentimental lie of readerly identification with fictional protagonists, and claims that a (morally acceptable) novel always exposes the delusions and hypocrisies of both reader and protagonist. Therefore, because for Girard Catholicism is the One True Faith, the authors Roy studies in depth would be Catholics qui s’ignorent, whose novels trick the reader into sympathizing with foolish or reprehensible behavior and beliefs only to undeceive and humble that reader later by ruthlessly exposing the protagonist’s moral defects (the most impressive examination of this tactic by a literary critic is Stanley Fish’s Surprised by Sin on Milton’s Paradise Lost). Reviews 1273 Roy shares Girard’s belief in the explanatory power of the concept of mimetic desire or mediated desire: we learn what to want by observing what others prize, as do the male victims of Freud’s Oedipus complex who desire their mother because they see their father desiring her (today, the increasing numbers of LGBT parents successfully raising ‘normal’ children who experience heterosexual desire suggest that both Freud’s and Girard’s views must be qualified). Of course, Girard’s concept of desire extends far beyond sexuality to other worldly goods such as wealth, power, and social status, as Pierre Bourdieu’s classic Distinction suggests. But Girard believes fictional characters...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.646
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œFrench reviewSame topicLiterature and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207