MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3137451152 · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.03.012

Association of Co-Exposure of Antenatal Steroid and Prophylactic Indomethacin with Spontaneous Intestinal Perforation

2021· letter· en· W3137451152 on OpenAlexafffund
Hemasree Kandraju, Jaideep Kanungo, Kyong‐Soon Lee, Sibasis Daspal, Mohammad Adie, Jon Dorling, Xiang Y. Ye, Shoo K. Lee, Prakesh S. Shah, Marc Beltempo, Joseph Ting, Zenon Cieslak, Rebecca Sherlock, Ayman Abou Mehrem, Jennifer Toye, Khalid Aziz, Carlos Fajardo, Jaya Bodani, Lannae Strueby, Mary Seshia, Deepak Louis, Ruben Alvaro, Amit Mukerji, Orlando da Silva, Brigitte Lemyre, Thierry Daboval, Faiza Khurshid, Ermelinda Pelausa, Keith J. Barrington, Anie Lapoint, Guillaume Éthier, Christine Drolet, Martine Claveau, Marie St‐Hilaire, Valérie Bertelle, Édith Massé, Roderick Canning, Hala Makary, Cecil Ojah, Luis Monterrosa, Julie Emberley, Jehier Afifi, Andrzej Kajetanowicz, Wendy Whittle, Michelle Morais, Leanne Dahlgren, Darine El‐Chaâr, Katherine Thériault, Annie Ouellet, Kimberly Butt, Stephen Wood, Amy Metcalfe, Candace O’Quinn, Christy Pylypjuk, Isabelle Boucoiran, Catherine Taillefer, Joan Crane, Haim A. Abenhaim, Graeme N. Smith, Karen Wou, Sue Chandra, Jagdeep Ubhi, George Carson, Michael Helewa, A Grigoriu, Rob Gratton, James E. Andrews, Nir Melamed, Jason Burrows, Fatima Taboun, Lara Wesson, Erin MacLellan, Hayley Boss, Vicky Allen

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Pediatrics · 2021
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicInfant Nutrition and Health
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai HospitalWindsor Regional HospitalUniversity of SaskatchewanHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of British ColumbiaDalhousie UniversityUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineGestationOdds ratioPerforationObstetricsProphylactic treatmentBirth weightGestational agePregnancyAntenatal steroidPediatricsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.645
Threshold uncertainty score0.799

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of PediatricsSame topicInfant Nutrition and HealthFrench-language works237,207