Constrained Domain Adaptation for Image Segmentation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Domain Adaption tasks have recently attracted substantial attention in computer vision as they improve the transferability of deep network models from a source to a target domain with different characteristics. A large body of state-of-the-art domain-adaptation methods was developed for image classification purposes, which may be inadequate for segmentation tasks. We propose to adapt segmentation networks with a constrained formulation, which embeds domain-invariant prior knowledge about the segmentation regions. Such knowledge may take the form of anatomical information, for instance, structure size or shape, which can be known a priori or learned from the source samples via an auxiliary task. Our general formulation imposes inequality constraints on the network predictions of unlabeled or weakly labeled target samples, thereby matching implicitly the prediction statistics of the target and source domains, with permitted uncertainty of prior knowledge. Furthermore, our inequality constraints easily integrate weak annotations of the target data, such as image-level tags. We address the ensuing constrained optimization problem with differentiable penalties, fully suited for conventional stochastic gradient descent approaches. Unlike common two-step adversarial training, our formulation is based on a single segmentation network, which simplifies adaptation, while improving training quality. Comparison with state-of-the-art adaptation methods reveals considerably better performance of our model on two challenging tasks. Particularly, it consistently yields a performance gain of 1-4% Dice across architectures and datasets. Our results also show robustness to imprecision in the prior knowledge. The versatility of our novel approach can be readily used in various segmentation problems, with code available publicly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".