A105 RAPID INTERDISCIPLINARY IBD CLINIC RESULTS IN TIMELY IBD WAIT TIMES, IMPROVED PATIENT SATISFACTION & PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) patients often have disease flares and extraintestinal manifestations such as rashes, arthralgias & perianal fistulas that require timely assessments. We implemented a Rapid Interdisciplinary IBD program at Mount Sinai Hospital with expedited consultation by an IBD specialist and referral with clinical need to collaborative colorectal surgeon, dermatologist, rheumatologist, and/or high-risk obstetrician. The RAPID program includes an online IBD Dashboard for patients to respond to questionnaires which is closely monitored 90 days post-enrolment by the IBD nurse. Aims To assess the implementation of an Interdisciplinary IBD Clinic & online IBD Dashboard monitoring system on the ability to increase patient satisfaction regarding their IBD care. Methods Upon consent into the RAPID IBD program, patients are enrolled to the IBD Dashboard and complete a Patient Satisfaction (CACHE) questionnaire at baseline, 3, 6, 12 months follow up and clinical disease activity scores at baseline, 1, 2, 3 months post enrollment; the Modified Harvey Bradshaw Index (mHBI) for Crohn’s disease (CD); partial Mayo score and Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI) for ulcerative colitis (UC) and IBD unclassified (IBDU) patients. Results were compared pre/post enrollment with changes in median and interquartile ranges (IQR). Results 109 patients were referred to RAPID, 88 (49 CD, 33 UC, 6 IBDU) enrolled & 62 consented to IBD Dashboard monitoring. Of those enrolled, 40 patients were referred based on flaring of clinical scores, 23 with potential flare or complication, 17 with acute extraintestinal manifestations, 4 pregnant and 4 with perianal disease. Median 4 (2–7) days to first GI IBD clinic. 15 patients were referred to dermatology, 12 to colorectal surgery, 8 to rheumatology and 3 to obstetrics. 6 patients visited the ER within the first 90 days after enrollment, with 1 (1–2) ER visits. Patient satisfaction improved from baseline 73.5% (68.4%-77.4%) (n=53) to 82.3% (75.5% - 84.0%) at 3 months (n=28). Clinical responses were seen post enrollment with a decrease in mHBI of 3.0 at 2 months, 1.5 on the 6-point Mayo (SF + RB) at 1 & 3 months and patient defined significant improvement in SCCAI greater than 1.5 after 1 month. Conclusions Preliminary results with RAPID IBD program demonstrate a short time to be seen by an IBD specialist, improvement in patient satisfaction and clinical responses in mHBI, pMayo and SCCAI scores 1–3 months post enrollment. Funding Agencies AMO
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".