MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3137590668 · doi:10.21423/aabppro20054848

Use of Bulk Tank Milk to Determine the Herd-level Prevalence of N. caninum in Dairy Herds on Prince Edward Island

2005· article· en· W3137590668 on OpenAlexaffabout
Wendela Wapenaar, Herman W. Barkema, C.J.M. Bartels, C. van Maanen

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference Proceedings · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicToxoplasma gondii Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Prince Edward Island
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeospora caninumHerdDairy cattleVeterinary medicineSerologyBulk tankNeosporaBiologyAnimal scienceAbortionMedicinePregnancyImmunologyAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The apicomplexan protozoan parasite Neospora caninum is one of the most frequently diagnosed causes of bovine abortion. Transmission of the parasite occurs vertically from cow to calf with great efficiency, sustaining the infection within cattle herds for many generations. The herd-level prevalence of N. caninum on PEI is estimated to be 20.3%. This is relatively high compared to other Canadian provinces and research is needed to aid in the control of this infection on dairy farms. Serology is the only method available to diagnose N. caninum infection in live animals, but herd surveillance, using serology, is expensive and time consuming, especially in large dairy herds. The use of milk as a diagnostic tool could be very beneficial to the dairy industry, as it would allow for a fast and inexpensive way to test herds for N. caninum exposure. Furthermore, because the majority of dairy herds in PEI collect milk samples monthly (DHI; Dairy Herd Improvement), Neospora surveillance using milk would result in less stress on the lactating cow, and no special visits would be required to collect samples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.181
Threshold uncertainty score0.605

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference ProceedingsSame topicToxoplasma gondii Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207