MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3137678498 · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.617773

Associations of Vascular Risk Factors, APOE and TOMM40 Polymorphisms With Cognitive Function in Dementia-Free Chinese Older Adults: A Community-Based Study

2021· article· en· W3137678498 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
W.J. Gui, Chengxuan Qiu, Qi Shao, Juan Li

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Psychiatry · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaBeijing Municipal Science and Technology CommissionVetenskapsrådetNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaSwedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education
KeywordsApolipoprotein EMedicineInternal medicineDementiaDiabetes mellitusMontreal Cognitive AssessmentCognitionGerontologyEndocrinologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: The associations of vascular risk factors (VRFs), apolipoprotein E (APOE), and translocase of outer mitochondrial membrane 40 (TOMM40) with cognitive function have been investigated mostly in western societies. In the present study, we sought to examine the associations of VRFs [i.e., current smoking, current drinking, physical inactivity, obesity, total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), diabetes, and hypertension] and variants located in APOE (ε2/3/4) and TOMM40 (rs2075650) with global cognitive function in Chinese older adults, with a focus on their potential interactions. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study that included 422 permanent residents (mean age 69.2 years, 54.3% female) living in Beijing, who were free of dementia. Data were collected through interviews, clinical examinations, and laboratory tests. The two genetic polymorphisms were genotyped, and participants were dichotomized as carriers vs. non-carriers of APOE ε4 or TOMM40 G. Global cognitive function was assessed with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Data were analyzed with multivariable linear regression models. Results: Physical inactivity and diabetes were independently associated with a lower MMSE score (all p < 0.05). When four putative VRFs (i.e., current smoking, physical inactivity, high LDL-C, and diabetes) were aggregated, an increasing number of having these factors was associated with a decreasing MMSE score in a dose–response manner (p = 0.001). TOMM40 polymorphisms, independent of the APOE ε4 allele, interacted with aggregated VRFs to influence cognitive performance, such that having one or more of these VRFs was particularly detrimental to the cognition of TOMM40 carriers. Further analyses revealed interactions of the TOMM40 polymorphism with (i) physical inactivity and (ii) diabetes, such that having either physical inactivity or diabetes in combination with carrying a TOMM40 G allele, compared to having neither, was significantly associated with a markedly lower MMSE score (all p < 0.05). Conclusion: This study provides some evidence supporting the association of vascular risk factors with poor cognitive performance among dementia-free Chinese older adults and further revealed their interactions with the TOMM40 polymorphism. The results underscore the vulnerability of global cognitive function to VRFs, which could be reinforced by carrying the TOMM40 rs2075650 G allele. These findings have potential implications for developing tailored intervention programs to maintain cognitive function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in PsychiatrySame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207