MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3137769701 · doi:10.1021/acsami.1c04293

Beyond Thin Films: Clarifying the Impact of <i>c</i> -Li <sub>15</sub> Si <sub>4</sub> Formation in Thin Film, Nanoparticle, and Porous Si Electrodes

2021· article· en· W3137769701 on OpenAlexafffund
Jasper Woodard, W. Peter Kalisvaart, Sayed Youssef Sayed, Brian C. Olsen, Jillian M. Buriak

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersWestern Economic Diversification CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsUniversity of AlbertaAlberta Innovates - Technology Futures
KeywordsMaterials scienceNanoparticleSiliconElectrodeChemical engineeringPorous siliconThin filmPhase (matter)NanotechnologyFaraday efficiencyElectrolyteOptoelectronicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The formation of the c -Li 15 Si 4 phase has well-established detrimental effects on the capacity retention of thin film silicon electrodes. However, the role of this crystalline phase with respect to the loss of capacity is somewhat ambiguous in nanoscale morphologies. In this work, three silicon-based morphologies are examined, including planar films, porous planar films, and silicon nanoparticle composite powder electrodes. The cycling conditions are used as the lever to induce, or not induce, the formation of c -Li 15 Si 4 through application of constant-current (CC) or constant-current constant-voltage (CCCV) steps. In this manner, the role of this phase on capacity retention and Coulombic efficiency can be determined with few other convoluting factors such as alteration of the composition or morphology of the silicon electrodes themselves. The results here confirm that the c -Li 15 Si 4 phase increases the rate of capacity decay in planar films but has no major effect on capacity retention in half-cells based on porous silicon films or silicon nanoparticle composite powder electrodes, although this conclusion is nuanced. Besides using a constant-voltage step, formation of the c -Li 15 Si 4 phase is influenced by the dimensions of the Si material and the lithiation cutoff voltage. Porous Si films, which, in this work, comprise primary Si particle sizes that are smaller than those in the preformed Si nanoparticle slurries, do not undergo the formation of c -Li 15 Si 4 at 50 mV, whereas Si nanoparticle slurries are accompanied by the formation of c -Li 15 Si 4 up to 80 mV. The solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) formed from reaction of the c -Li 15 Si 4 with the carbonate-based electrolyte causes polarization in both nanoparticle and porous film silicon electrodes and lowers the average Coulombic efficiency. A comparison of the cumulative irreversibilities due to SEI formation between different lithiation cutoff voltages in silicon nanoparticle slurry electrodes confirmed the connection between higher SEI buildup and formation of the c -Li 15 Si 4 phase. This work indicates that concerns about the c -Li 15 Si 4 phase in silicon nanoparticles and porous silicon electrodes should mainly focus on the stability of the SEI and a reduction of irreversible electrolyte reactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Applied Materials & InterfacesSame topicAdvancements in Battery MaterialsFrench-language works237,207