Fast and low‐power leading‐one detectors for energy‐efficient logarithmic computing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The logarithmic number system (LNS) can be used to simplify the computation of arithmetic functions, such as multiplication. This article proposes three leading‐one detectors (LODs) to speed up the binary logarithm calculation in the LNS. The first LOD (LOD I) uses a single fixed value to approximate the d least significant bits (LSBs) in the outputs of the LOD. The second design (LOD II) partitions the d LSBs into smaller fields and uses a multiplexer to select the closest approximation to the exact value. These two LODs help with error cancellation as they introduce signed errors for inputs N < 2 d . Additionally, a scaling scheme is proposed that scales up the input N < 2 d to avoid large approximation errors. Finally, an improved exact LOD (LOD III) is proposed that only passes half of the input N to the LOD; the more significant half is passed if there is at least one ‘1’ in that half; otherwise, the less significant half is passed. Our simulation results show that the 32‐bit LOD III can be up to 2.8× more energy‐efficient than existing designs in the literature. The Mitchell logarithmic multiplier and a neural network are considered to further illustrate the practicality of the proposed designs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".