International Law Treaty Developments Affecting the Bio-Based Economy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
English Abstract: Recent years have brought developments in international law with direct bearing on the bio-based economy. The primary development has been the entry into force of the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Other relevant developments have occurred at the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO), the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) and Canada’s adoption of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). This article surveys the various developments, and posits that changes in Canada’s approach to genetic resources and traditional knowledge may evolve given changes in Government policy towards Indigenous Peoples. French Abstract: Les evolutions des dernieres annees en droit international ont eu une incidence directe sur la bioeconomie. La plus notable est l’entree en vigueur du Protocole de Nagoya sur l’acces aux ressources genetiques et le partage juste et equitable des avantages decoulant de leur utilisation a la Convention sur la diversite biologique, mais d’autres developpements ont notamment eu lieu du cote de l’Organisation mondiale de la propriete intellectuelle, de l’UNESCO et du Canada, qui a ratifie la Declaration des Nations Unies sur les droits des peuples autochtones. L’article survole les diverses nouveautes et suggere, a la lumiere de la nouvelle orientation politique du gouvernement a l’egard des peuples autochtones, que le Canada pourrait changer d’orientation quant a ses ressources genetiques et aux savoirs ancestraux.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".