Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’Argentine est secouée depuis 2015 par un regain des luttes féministes, notamment grâce au mouvement Ni una menos et à la campagne pour le droit à l’avortement. Certaines compagnies théâtrales argentines prennent d’assaut la scène pour nourrir et défendre ces mobilisations. L’association Teatro x la Identidad, créée en 2000 dans l’idée de soutenir le projet des Grands-mères de la Place de Mai, semble s’inscrire dans ce mouvement, bien que sa mission n’explicite pas un engagement féministe. Cet article propose de démontrer en quoi le Teatro x la Identidad, qui se définit comme un outil de changement socio-culturel depuis 20 ans, appuie les revendications féministes actuelles. Celles-ci seront d’abord brièvement contextualisées. Puis seront exposés l’évolution du mandat de l’association Teatro x la Identidad et les différents aspects de son travail qui se rapportent à la justice sociale. Enfin, trois textes du Teatro x la Identidad seront analysés afin d’en dévoiler le caractère féministe : Gloria de Virginia Feinmann joué en 2014, El Origen de Carol Inturias produit en 2015 et Rosaura de Pablo dos Reis présenté en 2017.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".