MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3137853349 · doi:10.1002/htj.22130

Flow of three‐dimensional radiative Williamson fluid over an inclined stretching sheet with Hall current and <i>n</i>th‐order chemical reaction

2021· article· en· W3137853349 on OpenAlexaff
MD. Shamshuddin, Fazle Mabood, S.O. Salawu

Bibliographic record

VenueHeat Transfer · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
Canadian institutionsFanshawe College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNusselt numberSherwood numberDimensionless quantityThermodynamicsMechanicsChemistryRadiative transferPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In the current communication, three‐dimensional Williamson fluid flow past a bidirectional inclined stretching plate with novel Hall current, nonuniform heat source/sink, and n th‐order chemical reaction features are investigated. Rosseland's diffusion model is defined for the radiation heat transfer. The nonlinear governing derivative equations satisfying the flow are transmuted to the coupled derivative equations by employing the local similarity quantities and then solved numerically through the Runge–Kutta–Fehlberg method utilizing the shooting quadrature. An inclusive analysis is reported via graphs for the flow rate field, temperature, and concentration distributions for different evolving terms of immense concern. Wall dragging effect and wall heat gradient and wall concentration gradient have been examined, plotted, and described. The detailed geometry reveals that dimensionless velocity field is monotonically rising as the Hall parameter rises. The chemical reaction concentration for the Williamson fluid is enhanced with expanding values of the magnetic field parameter. Transitional values of wall stress components upturn with an increase in Hall parameter while the Williamson term is boosted. Nusselt number is reduced as the Williamson term rises and the Sherwood number enhances with a rising chemical reaction term. The results are verified for limiting cases by comparing with various investigations and found to have excellent accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHeat TransferSame topicNanofluid Flow and Heat TransferFrench-language works237,207