MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3138063070 · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2021.01.050

Myocardial T1 and T2 Mapping by Magnetic Resonance in Patients With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor–Associated Myocarditis

2021· article· en· W3138063070 on OpenAlexafffund
Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan, Lili Zhang, Amna Zafar, Zsófia D. Drobni, Syed Mahmood, Marcella Cabral, Magid Awadalla, Anju Nohria, Daniel A. Zlotoff, Franck Thuny, Lucie Heinzerling, Ana Barac, Ryan J. Sullivan, Carol L. Chen, Dipti Gupta, Michael Constantin Kirchberger, Sarah Hartmann, Jonathan W. Weinsaft, Hannah Gilman, Muhammad A. Rizvi, Bojan Kovacina, Caroline Michel, Gagan Sahni, Ana González‐Mansilla, Antonio Calles, Francisco Fernández‐Avilés, Michael Mahmoudi, Kerry L. Reynolds, Sarju Ganatra, Juán José Gavira, Nahikari Salterain González, M. Castro, Raymond Y. Kwong, Michael Jerosch‐Herold, Otávio R. Coelho‐Filho, Jonathan Afilalo, Eduardo Zatarain‐Nicolás, A. John Baksi, Bernd J. Wintersperger, Oscar Calvillo‐Argüelles, Stéphane Éderhy, Alexander R Lyon, Michael G. Fradley, Tomas G. Neilan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American College of Cardiology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkMcGill UniversityToronto General HospitalJewish General HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthKohlberg FoundationCSL BehringCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHarvard University Center for AIDS ResearchCanada Research ChairsNew York Academy of MedicineAstraZeneca
KeywordsMedicineMyocarditisCardiogenic shockInternal medicineEjection fractionCardiologyMaceMagnetic resonance imagingCardiac magnetic resonancePericardial effusionHeart failureMyocardial infarctionPercutaneous coronary interventionRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.380

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations188
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American College of CardiologySame topicCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersFrench-language works237,207