Advances in cirrhotic cardiomyopathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy (CCM) is a well-recognized entity. When patients with CCM encounter challenges such as liver transplantation, overt cardiac dysfunction manifests, leading to morbidity and mortality. Although revised diagnostic criteria for CCM have recently been proposed, these still need to be validated. RECENT FINDINGS: Previous reviews have summarized the mechanisms of CCM, such as abnormalities of the β-adrenergic pathway, cardiac plasma membrane biophysical and biochemical properties, and electrophysiological changes. Cardiomyocyte apoptosis, inflammation, and oxidative stress also play important roles. The present review details further mechanisms of CCM, which include myosin heavy chain isoform shifts and abnormalities in cellular calcium transients. Additionally, we review recent studies on therapeutic strategies. Recent work underscores the importance of CCM in the natural history of the immediate and medium-term postoperative period after liver transplantation. Appropriate management strategies for CCM remain the area of greatest unmet need, requiring much further research. SUMMARY: CCM is a clinically relevant syndrome affecting patients with cirrhosis, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. New diagnostic criteria have been recently proposed by an expert working group. The pathogenic mechanisms remain incompletely clarified and optimal management strategies need much further study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".