Efficacy of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Autoimmune Diseases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) may be efficacious for autoimmune diseases (AIDs), but its efficacy for individual AIDs is unknown. Factors influencing the likelihood of relapse for each AID are also unknown. This study aimed to determine the likelihood of relapse for each common AID and to generate hypotheses about factors influencing the likelihood of relapse. We reviewed charts of adult patients with nonhematologic AIDs who had undergone HCT in Alberta (n = 21) and patients described in the literature (n = 67). We used stringent inclusion criteria to minimize the inclusion of patients whose AID may have been cured before transplantation. We also used stringent definitions of AID relapse and remission. AID relapsed in 2 of 9 patients (22%) with lupus, in 4 of 12 (33%) with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), in 0 of 4 (0%) with systemic sclerosis (SSc), in 3 of 16 (19%) with psoriasis, in 1 of 12 (8%) with Behçet's disease (BD), in 1 of 15 (7%) with Crohn's disease (CD), in 0 of 5 (0%) with ulcerative colitis (UC), in 4 of 8 (50%) with multiple sclerosis (MS), and in 3 of 3 (100%) with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Among highly informative patients (followed for >1 year after discontinuation of immunosuppressive therapy if no relapse, or donor AID status known if relapse), relapse occurred in 0 of 3 patients with lupus, in 2 of 7 with RA, in 0 of 2 with SSc, in 3 of 6 with psoriasis, in 0 of 3 with BD, in 0 of 10 with CD, in 0 of 3 with UC, in 2 of 3 with MS, and in 2 of 2 with T1DM. There appeared to be no associations between AID relapse and low intensity of pretransplantation chemoradiotherapy, multiple lines of AID therapy (surrogate for AID refractoriness) except perhaps for lupus, absence of serotherapy for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, lack of GVHD except perhaps for lupus, or incomplete donor chimerism. Even though remission commonly occurs after HCT in lupus, RA, SSc, psoriasis, BD, CD, and UC, HCT is efficacious for only a subset of patients. The efficacy appears to be unrelated to pretransplantation therapy, GVHD, or chimerism. Large studies are needed to determine the characteristics of patients likely to benefit from HCT for each AID.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".