In Search of Credentials: Factors Affecting Young Adults' Participation in Postsecondary Education
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper uses longitudinal data from a survey of youth in three areas (Hamilton, Halifax and rural Nova Scotia) to examine the factors that affect young adults' participation in postsecondary education, applying Bourdieu's notions of capital and habitus. Data were collected from 1,200 youth in 1989, with questionnaire follow-ups in 1992 and 1994. The analyses examine (a) the factors the youth themselves say affect their educational decisions and (b) cross-tabulation and regression results that document the variables empirically related to the youth's educational expectations when they are seventeen and their attainments by age twenty-four. Cost factors were found to be a major deterrent as were, for some youth, their knowledge of and attitudes to schooling. Parental education and income affect their children's decisions. University is seen to be "the" preferred postsecondary path; other institutions such as community colleges seem to be the "fall back" option for those who cannot or do not get to university. Results are relevant to an understanding of the persistent impact of parental capital and of one's attitudes on educational outcomes. There are also policy implications regarding the resources needed by different students to better access the postsecondary options available to them.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".