Proposing a Knowledge-based Model for Photovoltaic Modules Operating under Shading Conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In a photovoltaic (PV) control system, the application of a maximum power point tracking (MPPT) method is the key factor that enables PV modules to operate efficiently under shading conditions. However, dealing with technical parameters of the MPPT-based controller requires expertise’s knowledge about MPPT methods. PV planning tools overlook to provide system design parameters needed for the control system. Ontologies, as knowledge-based models, provide improved representation, sharing and re-use of the relevant information that facilitate the process of decision-making. In this work, we propose a knowledge-based model representing key concepts associated with an MPPT-based control device. The ontology model is featured with Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) allowing the system planner to extract information about MPPT classifications and select an appropriate MPPT method. Moreover, technical recommendations and design information needed for the control system is delivered as well. Using the proposed ontology helps nontechnical practitioners and end-users to define design-related parameters correctly and plan efficient PV systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".