MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3138296170 · doi:10.1161/str.52.suppl_1.p259

Abstract P259: The Association Between Sex, Gender and Health Status of Stroke Survivors in the Canadian Population

2021· article· en· W3138296170 on OpenAlexaffabout
Zahra Azizi, Valeria Raparelli, Colleen M. Norris, Khaled El Emam, Louise Pilote

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaUniversity of AlbertaMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMarital statusStroke (engine)Quality of life (healthcare)GerontologyPopulationDemographyEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Stroke is one of the most common cerebrovascular diseases causing permanent disability, and decreased quality of life (QoL). Both sex and gender have been reported to be associated with health outcomes. Gender, unlike biological sex, encompasses the psycho-socio-cultural roles, behaviors and identities of men, women, and gender-diverse people. Hypothesis: To examine the association between sociocultural gender, biological sex and health status among stroke survivors in the Canadian population. Methods: Data from cycles 2013-2014 and 2015-16 (n=237,121) of the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) were analyzed. The primary endpoint of the study was Health Utility Index (HUI), a measure of health status and QoL. This index measures a range of health domains (i.e. vision, hearing, speech, ambulation, dexterity, emotion, cognition, and pain) and ranges between -0.36 (severe health state) to 1 (perfect health state). A gender score was computed based on the Genesis-Praxy method, using a principal component analysis-derived propensity score method. The final gender scores ranging from 0 to 1 (higher score identifying characteristics traditionally ascribed to women) included household size, perceived life stress, education, sense of belonging to community, marital status, and income. All statistical analyses were performed using R (V.4.0.2) with survey design. Results: Amongst 3,773 (1.1%) stroke survivors in two cycles, 47.8% were female and a majority were older than 50 years (85.3%). Overall, 76.4% of the stroke survivors had moderate to severe HUI (<=0.88), however, this rate was higher in females (82.5% vs 70.2%, P<0.001). Median gender score was 0.49 [0.46-0.55]. Higher gender scores (OR=12.5, 95%CI=1.4-116.2, P=0.02) and female sex (OR=1.8, 95%CI=1.2-2.8, P=0.002) were independently associated with moderately to severely diminished health status (HUI) in a model adjusted for age, and comorbidities (i.e. hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, and history of cancer). Conclusion: Characteristics traditionally ascribed to women’s gender and female sex were associated with poorer health status in stroke survivors. Gender-related factors must be targeted for improving the health status of patients suffering from stroke.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score0.309

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStrokeSame topicCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207