MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3138402725 · doi:10.36076/ppj.2008/11/863

Pulsed Radiofrequency for Metastatic PainTreatment

2008· article· en· W3138402725 on OpenAlexaff
Joseph F. Jasper

Bibliographic record

VenuePain Physician · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Canadian institutionsBaylis Medical (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCannulaMedicineZygapophyseal JointNeurolysisFluoroscopyImaging phantomImage stitchingLesionSurgeryRadiologyNuclear medicineBiomedical engineeringLumbarFacet joint

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Radiofrequency neurolysis is a common technique used in the treatment of chronic pain, particularly facet (zygapophyseal joint) arthralgia. A needle-like cannula is insulated except for the exposed active tip, which is positioned as parallel and adjacent as possible to the targeted nerve branch. Via an inserted probe connected to a radiofrequency generator, energy flowing from the tip of the cannula creates a heat lesion in the 80 – 85 degree Celsius range mostly about the length of the exposed active tip and in proportion to the diameter of the probe. The common active tip lengths used for neurolysis are 5mm or 10mm. The cannulae are FDA approved. The manufacturer advises physicians not to bend or otherwise modify a cannula prior to use. The cannulae are available straight or bent, sharp and blunt. The technique is guided under C-arm fluoroscopy. X-rays passing through the patient demonstrate in 2 dimensions the projected relative radio-opaque bony landmarks and the metallic cannula. Most currently available cannulae are uniform in their radio-opacity from tip to hub. The physician must make an educated guess as to the portion of the cannula that will be making the lesion in relationship to the bony landmark. Objective: A new radiofrequency cannula with a radio-opaque marker (ROC) delineates the proximal end of the active tip. The cannula was used in a phantom model. Images were reproduced with explanation of the potential advantage of the new device. Result: The marker on the new cannula was visible and did help delineate the active tip as well as its orientation. It was also helpful in making sequential lesions at the same nerve using a “tip to tail” repositioning technique. Conclusion: The ROC did represent an improvement over standard cannulae to optimize visualization of cannula and thus lesion placement using a phantom model. The applications described were only for conventional or “hot” RF. Key words: Anesthesiology, neurology, neurosurgery, physical medicine and rehabilitation, radiology, radiofrequency, neurolysis, rhizotomy

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.725
Threshold uncertainty score0.484

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePain PhysicianSame topicCancer Treatment and PharmacologyFrench-language works237,207