Drug-resistant hypertension in primary aldosteronism patients undergoing adrenal vein sampling: the AVIS-2-RH study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: We aimed at determining the rate of drug-resistant arterial hypertension in patients with an unambiguous diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA). Moreover, we sought for investigating the diagnostic performance of adrenal vein sampling (AVS), and the effect of adrenalectomy on blood pressure (BP) and prior treatment resistance in PA patients subtyped by AVS in major referral centres. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Adrenal Vein Sampling International Study-2 (AVIS-2) was a multicentre international study that recruited consecutive PA patients submitted to AVS, according to current guidelines, during 15 years. The patients were over 18 years old with arterial hypertension and had an unambiguous diagnosis of PA. The rate of resistant hypertension was assessed at baseline and after adrenalectomy using the American Heart Association (AHA) 2018 definition. Information on presence or absence of resistant hypertension was available in 89% of the 1625 enrolled PA patients. Based on the AHA 2018 criteria, resistant hypertension was found in 20% of patients, of which about two-thirds (14%) were men and one-third (6%) women (χ2 = 17.1, P < 1*10-4) with a higher rate of RH in men than in women (23% vs. 15% P < 1*10-4). Of the 292 patients with resistant hypertension, 98 (34%) underwent unilateral AVS-guided adrenalectomy, which resolved BP resistance to antihypertensive treatment in all. CONCLUSIONS: (i) Resistant hypertension is a common presentation in patients seeking surgical cure of PA; (ii) AVS is key for the optimal management of patients with PA due to resistant hypertension; and (iii) AVS-guided adrenalectomy allowed resolution of treatment-resistant hypertension.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".