Weight loss and fitness intervention increase markers of hepatic bile acid (BA) synthesis, while reducing serum total BA concentrations in sedentary, obese insulin resistant women
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Beyond adipose and muscle, excerise has profound effects in other metabolically‐important tissues including the liver. Bile acids (BAs) are synthesized from cholesterol via the rate‐limiting enzyme cholesterol 7 alpha‐hydroxylase (CYP7A1) and contribute to the solubilization and absorption of lipid soluble nutrients, and serve as important signaling molecules capable of systemic endocrine function. Circulating BA are known to be higher in obesity and insulin resistance, but effects following exercise and diet‐induced weight loss are unknown. To test if improved fitness and weight loss influence bile acid metabolism and homeostasis, we measured fasting serum concentrations of total BAs (conjugated and free forms of primary and secondary BAs) in sedentary, obese insulin‐resistant women (N=12) before and after a ~14 wk weight loss and exercise intervention [Campell et al. 2014, PLoS One, 9: e84260]. In addition, serum FGF19 (a regulator of BA synthesis) and 7‐alpha‐hydroxy‐cholesten‐3‐one (C4, a verified marker of CYP7A1 enzymatic acitivity) were measured by ELISA and LC‐MS, respectively. Using mixed‐model analyses and the change in relative VO 2peak (mL/min/kg) as a covariate, we observed a significant decrease (~30%) in total serum BAs post‐intervention relative to pre‐intervention samples. Corresponding to the decrease in total BAs, fasting serum concentrations of C4 were 55% higher post‐intervention relative to the matched pre‐intervention samples (P=0.004). Interestingly, we observed no changes in serum FGF19. These data suggest that weight loss and/or improved fitness altered BA metabolism marked by increased hepatic BA synthesis and reduced serum BA. The underlying mechanisms remain to be determined, but work from our preclinical rodent models supports the idea that increased BA metabolic flux is linked to enhanced hepatic mitochondrial function. Support or Funding Information This work was supported by USDA Projects 6026‐51000‐010‐05S and 2032‐51530‐022‐00D, and NIH‐NIDDK R01DK078328 and NIDDK U24 DK097154. This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".