Perinatal depression and children's developmental outcomes at 2 years postpartum
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Perinatal depression has been associated with a range of adverse outcomes for children's neurodevelopment. AIMS: This study sought to examine the impact of maternal perinatal depression on 2-year-olds' social-emotional, cognitive, language, and adaptive behavioural development, using data collected at the fifth timepoint of a prospective longitudinal study, which followed participants from pregnancy through to toddlerhood. PARTICIPANTS: 61 women and their children (M age = 26 months, SD = 1.83; 35 boys and 26 girls), of the original cohort of 98, who had been recruited during pregnancy, and stratified into three participant groups: 1. Depressed (those with a clinical diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder [MDD]); 2. History (currently euthymic with a previous MDD episode); 3. Control (no history of psychiatric disorder). OUTCOME MEASURES: Depression severity was assessed using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), and children's developmental outcomes were measured using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, 3rd Edition (BSID-III). RESULTS: No direct associations between mothers' depression and children's social-emotional, cognitive or language development were observed. However, an unexpected positive association between maternal depression and children's social adaptive behaviour was found, which conferred an advantage on children whose mothers had suffered from depression. CONCLUSIONS: The current findings contribute to the literature examining the impact of perinatal depression on early childhood outcomes. The unexpected positive association found between maternal depression and children's adaptive behaviour should prompt further research examining the adaptive resilience of young children exposed to maternal depression. This is discussed in the context of differential-susceptibility theory.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it