Isolation and re-connection: the formation of a ring-shaped speciation continuum in an odorous frog (Odorrana margaretae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Green Odorous Frog (Odorrana margaretae) around the Sichuan Basin of western China displays a ring-shaped distributional pattern and possesses multiple replicate contact zones between lineages at various levels of differentiation. To understand its unique speciation history and mechanisms, we obtained 1,540 SNPs from 29 populations and 227 individuals using ddRAD sequencing. Population structure analysis revealed three groups within the species: The West, the North & South, and the East groups. These groups were initially isolated at ~2.03 million years ago, and subsequent post-glacial expansion produced the current ring-shaped distribution around Sichuan Basin with three contact zones. Hybridization in those zones involved lineages with different levels of divergence and produced greatly different outcomes. Both the hybrid zones at southwest (S-W) and southeast (E-NS) of the Basin have extensive admixture and less barrier effect. Consequently, the southern region has the highest genetic diversity and becomes an ‘evolutionary melting pot’. In contrast, the hybrid zone at northwestern corner (N-W), which resembles the overlap zone between two expansion terminals of a ring species, has limited admixture with a narrow geographic cline, suggesting partial reproductive isolation between the northern and western populations. The three hybrid zones likely resemble three time points along a speciation continuum; while both E-NS and S-W hybrid zones are merging, the N-W zone may have passed the ‘tipping point’ and is destined for a complete reproductive isolation over time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".