MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3139288568 · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041845

PREVENTion of CLots in Orthopaedic Trauma (PREVENT CLOT): a randomised pragmatic trial protocol comparing aspirin versus low-molecular-weight heparin for blood clot prevention in orthopaedic trauma patients

2021· article· en· W3139288568 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Deborah M. Stein, Katherine P. Frey, Nathan N. O’Hara, Daniel O. Scharfstein, Tara Taylor, Bryce E. Haac, Anthony R. Carlini, Theodore T. Manson, Kuladeep Sudini, C. Daniel Mullins, Stephen T. Wegener, Reza Firoozabadi, Elliott R. Haut, Michael J. Bosse, Rachel B. Seymour, Martha B. Holden, Ida Leah Gitajn, Samuel Z. Goldhaber, Alexander L. Eastman, Gregory J. Jurkovich, Heather A. Vallier, Joshua L. Gary, Conor P. Kleweno, Joseph Cuschieri, Debra Marvel, Renan C. Castillo

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Open · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthAgency for Healthcare Research and QualityUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at HoustonYale UniversityVanderbilt UniversityMcMaster UniversityJohns Hopkins UniversityDartmouth CollegeUniversity of MiamiBrown UniversityPatient-Centered Outcomes Research InstituteMcGovern Medical SchoolMassachusetts General Hospital
KeywordsMedicinePulmonary embolismDeep veinAspirinLow molecular weight heparinThrombosisOrthopedic surgeryRandomized controlled trialHip fractureClinical trialSurgeryPhysical therapyIntensive care medicineInternal medicineOsteoporosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Patients who sustain orthopaedic trauma are at an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), including fatal pulmonary embolism (PE). Current guidelines recommend low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for VTE prophylaxis in orthopaedic trauma patients. However, emerging literature in total joint arthroplasty patients suggests the potential clinical benefits of VTE prophylaxis with aspirin. The primary aim of this trial is to compare aspirin with LMWH as a thromboprophylaxis in fracture patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: PREVENT CLOT is a multicentre, randomised, pragmatic trial that aims to enrol 12 200 adult patients admitted to 1 of 21 participating centres with an operative extremity fracture, or any pelvis or acetabular fracture. The primary outcome is all-cause mortality. We will evaluate non-inferiority by testing whether the intention-to-treat difference in the probability of dying within 90 days of randomisation between aspirin and LMWH is less than our non-inferiority margin of 0.75%. Secondary efficacy outcomes include cause-specific mortality, non-fatal PE and deep vein thrombosis. Safety outcomes include bleeding complications, wound complications and deep surgical site infections. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The PREVENT CLOT trial has been approved by the ethics board at the coordinating centre (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health) and all participating sites. Recruitment began in April 2017 and will continue through 2021. As both study medications are currently in clinical use for VTE prophylaxis for orthopaedic trauma patients, the findings of this trial can be easily adopted into clinical practice. The results of this large, patient-centred pragmatic trial will help guide treatment choices to prevent VTE in fracture patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02984384.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.024
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.128

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0240.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.004
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0080.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ OpenSame topicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and ManagementFrench-language works237,207