An autoregulation loop in <i>fust-1</i> for circular RNA regulation in <i>Caenorhabditis elegans</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are always expressed tissue-specifically, suggestive of specific factors that regulate their biogenesis. Here, taking advantage of available mutation strains of RNA binding proteins (RBPs) in Caenorhabditis elegans , I performed a screening of circRNA regulation in thirteen conserved RBPs. Among them, loss of FUST-1, the homolog of FUS (Fused in Sarcoma), caused downregulation of multiple circRNAs. By rescue experiments, I confirmed FUST-1 as a circRNA regulator. Further, I showed that FUST-1 regulates circRNA formation without affecting the levels of the cognate linear mRNAs. When recognizing circRNA pre-mRNAs, FUST-1 can affect both exon-skipping and circRNA in the same genes. Moreover, I identified an autoregulation loop in fust-1 , where FUST-1, isoform a promotes the skipping of exon 5 of its own pre-mRNA, which produces FUST-1, isoform b with different N-terminal sequences. FUST-1, isoform a is the functional isoform in circRNA regulation. Although FUST-1, isoform b has the same functional domains as isoform a, it cannot regulate either exon-skipping or circRNA formation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".