MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Source-process partitioning of soil N2O and CO2 production: nitrogen and simulated exudate additions

2020· article· en· W3139408665 on OpenAlexaff
Erin J. Daly, Guillermo Hernandez‐Ramirez

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryNitrous oxideNitrogenBiochemistryAnimal scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding the source partitioning of carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitrous oxide (N2O) fluxes from soil is integral for the characterization of total fluxes and the quantification of potential soil organic matter priming effects. Additionally, we utilized 15N-N2O site preference data to analyze the process priming of microbial nitrification and denitrification on subsequent N2O fluxes. A 32-day laboratory incubation was designed to examine the effects of artificial exudate, nitrogen fertilizer and their potential interactive effects on CO2 and N2O fluxes, soil organic matter source-priming and N2O process-priming. Artificial root exudate (ARE) consisting of a mixture of 99 atom% 13C labelled compounds at three addition rates (0, 6.2, 12.5 mg C kg-1 soil day-1) was applied daily for 21 days to microcosms with or without urea fertilizer, a subset of which was labelled with 5 atom % 15N. Measurements of CO2 and N2O fluxes, isotopic composition and N2O site preference were frequent throughout the duration of the experiment. Source partitioning of CO2 fluxes showed that soil organic carbon (SOM-C) positive priming was significantly altered by additions of artificial exudate and urea (p < 0.001 and 0.001, respectively). When applied concurrently, urea addition had an antagonistic interactive effect on SOM-C sourced CO2 fluxes (p < 0.001). Source partitioning of N2O flux data revealed that soil organic matter nitrogen (SOM-N) was positively primed for N2O flux by the addition of urea fertilizer (p < 0.001), but positive SOM-N priming was reduced by an antagonistic interaction with artificial exudate application (p < 0.001). Further, examination of 15N-N2O site preference found that the main processes by which N2O is formed (nitrification and denitrification) were differentially process-primed by the addition or absence of ARE. Cumulative denitrification and nitrification contributions to total N2O flux were both positively primed in the soils receiving both ARE and urea inputs relative to a control (50.0 ± 10.1 and 28.2± 8.0 μg N2O-N kg-1, respectively). In soils receiving only ARE application, denitrification-derived N2O was negatively primed relative to a control and thus contributed less to overall N2O flux (-9.5 ± 12.4 μg N2O-N kg-1) but nitrification-derived N2O was positively primed (17.2 ± 9.0 μg N2O-N kg-1).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsFrench-language works237,207