MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3139457753 · doi:10.1161/str.52.suppl_1.p467

Abstract P467: Clinical Effectiveness of Endovascular Stroke Treatment in the Early and Extended Time Windows

2021· article· en· W3139457753 on OpenAlexaff
Raul G. Nogueira, Diogo C Haussen, David S. Liebeskind, Tudor G. Jovin, Rishi Gupta, Jeffrey L. Saver, Ashutosh P. Jadhav, R Budzik, Blaise Baxter, Antonı́n Krajina, Alain Bonafé, Ali Malek, Narata Ana Paula, Mahmoud Mohammaden, Yanchang Zhang, Patricia M. Morgan, Minyi Ji, Bruno Bartolini, Joey English, Gregory W. Albers, Michael Mlynash, Maarten G. Lansberg, Frankel Michael, Vítor Mendes Pereira, Erol Veznedaroglu

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsToronto Western Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineClinical trialRandomized controlled trialStroke (engine)Prospective cohort studyPatient registrySurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Purpose: The clinical efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has been unequivocally demonstrated in multiple randomized clinical trials (RCTs). However, these studies were performed in carefully selected centers and utilized strict inclusion criteria. We aim to assess the clinical effectiveness of MT by comparing the specific RCT populations with corresponding patient cohorts derived from a prospective registry. Methods: A total of 2008 patients from 76 sites across 12 countries were enrolled in a prospective open-label MT registry. Patients were categorized into the corresponding cohorts of the SWIFT-Prime, DAWN, and DEFUSE 3 trials based on the age, baseline NIHSS, occlusion site, IV tPA use, pre-morbid mRS and time to treatment criteria used in the RCTs without considering specific parenchymal imaging findings. Baseline and outcome variables were compared across the corresponding groups. Results: As compared to the treated patients in the actual trials, registry-derived patients tended to be younger and had lower baseline ASPECTS. In addition, time to treatment was earlier and the use of IV tPA and general anesthesia were higher in DAWN- and DEFUSE 3-registry derived patients versus their corresponding trials. Reperfusion rates were higher in the registry patients. The rates of 90-day good outcome (mRS 0-2) in registry-derived patients were comparable to those of the patients treated in the corresponding RCTs (SWIFT-Prime, 64.5% vs 60.2%; DAWN, 50.4% vs 48.6%; Beyond-DAWN: 52.4% vs 48.6%; DEFUSE 3, 52% vs 44.6%, respectively; all P>0.05). Registry-derived patients had significant less disability than the corresponding RCT controls (ordinal mRS shift OR, P <0.05 for all). Conclusion: Our study provides favorable generalizability data for the safety and efficacy of thrombectomy in the “real-world” setting and supports that patients may be safely treated outside the constraints of RCTs and strict guidelines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→