MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3139466609 · doi:10.1109/mwc.001.2000264

A Novel Centralized Cloud-Based Mobile Data Rollover Management

2021· article· en· W3139466609 on OpenAlexaff
Zhaleh Sadreddini, Halim Yanıkömeroğlu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Wireless Communications · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceRoamingCloud computingService (business)The InternetMobile broadbandService providerData as a serviceComputer networkComputer securityTelecommunicationsWorld Wide WebWirelessBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mobile service providers (SPs) offer various data plans to satisfy the needs of their customers and to maximize their own profits. One of these plans is unlimited Internet access. However, in practice there is a concern for customers who do not want to pay premium prices for unlimited plans, as exceeding the maximum data allowance in a limited plan may result in a high penalty. But when users travel abroad, roaming services based on current technology have limited coverage and high prices, which do not meet customer expectations. A new paradigm to overcome these problems is a virtual SIM card (V-SIM), which can be established based on 5G network architecture. This new approach uses cloud technology to enable customers to have the data they require wherever they want. In this work, we propose a cloud-based service for users to provide data all over the world by designing the novel architecture of V-SIM technology based on 5G communication systems. More precisely, a new scheme, called a centralized cloud data center, or `data-pool' for short, is designed to present data rent and release facilities for mobile users any time and everywhere. The benefits of the proposed scheme for both SPs and their customers are modeled and analyzed based on real-world experiments. Finally, by considering the user's behavior, the performance of the proposed approach is compared to the conventional method in terms of the monthly data usage, monthly data rent/offload status, and the payment with and without considering the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Wireless CommunicationsSame topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207