MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The Stickiness of Instagram: Digital Labor and Postslavery Legacies in Kara Walker's “A Subtlety”

2019· article· en· W3140004584 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Brophy

Bibliographic record

VenueCultural Critique · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Feminism, and Media
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaUniversity at BuffaloMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Michigan
KeywordsSociologyPolitical scienceEconomic historyMedia studiesHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Stickiness of InstagramDigital Labor and Postslavery Legacies in Kara Walker's "A Subtlety" Sarah Brophy (bio) From May 10 to July 6, 2014, the African American artist Kara Walker's "A Subtlety, or The Marvelous Sugar Baby" existed as a temporary, site-specific installation at the Domino Sugar Factory in Brooklyn, New York (Figure 1). A maximalist sculpture of polystyrene foam coated in thirty tons of bleached white sugar donated by the Domino Sugar Corporation, standing thirty-five feet tall, stretching seventy-five long, and featuring a face resembling the artist's own, Walker's sphinx-shaped nude was sexualized in ways that evoked "Hottentot," "Jezebel," and "mammy" stereotypes. It symbolized the slave system and the sugar industry's massive appropriation and mystification of black women's labor, including but not limited to sexual, domes-tic, and caring labor. While Walker's sugar sphinx has been extensively photographed and written about, equally significant were the fifteen five-foot tall figures of laboring boys—some made of molasses and resin, others of hard candy—who surrounded her, carrying baskets and field produce. In another ugly image of exploited labor, their decomposition in the heat led Walker to heap up the broken bits of their bodies in the baskets of the few boys who continued to stand (Figure 2). "A Subtlety" thus offered a dazzling iconography of the ongoing legacies of the slavery economy and the continuing effacement—the white-washing—of its brutality. This article explores and assesses the pivotal roles of self-inscription, mediation, and audience participation for Walker's project. I focus on the popularity and impact of the hashtag #karawalkerdomino, which saw six thousand user-generated images posted on social media platforms (primarily on Instagram but also on Twitter and Facebook) during the first two days of the exhibition (Ovation Staff)—a number that [End Page 1] Click for larger view View full resolution Figure 1. Installation View of "A Subtlety." Copyright Andrew Burton/Getty Images. Click for larger view View full resolution Figure 2. Installation View of "A Subtlety." Copyright Andrew Burton/Getty Images. [End Page 2] eventually rose to more than twenty-five thousand posts (Creative Time). "A Subtlety" directly solicited the making and sharing of vernacular digital photographic images by visitors, a strategy informed by twenty-first-century social media outreach trends in the museum sector (Kaufman) and by relational aesthetics, that participatory, audience-oriented mobilization of the avant-garde that has been a mainstay of art world institutions since the mid-1990s (Balzer 66–67). Through physical signs instructing visitors "not to touch the artwork" but instead to upload images on social media, #karawalkerdomino was built into the exhibition from the outset. Anticipated to be equipped with smart devices, visitors were invited, as the website reiterates, to "help build the Digital Sugar Baby, an interactive 3D version of Kara Walker's marvelous artwork! … This living tribute to Kara's work will evolve over the course of the exhibition. Visit this site each week to see its progress" (Creative Time). The implied premise was that no single shot could encompass an installation built on such an enormous scale, and so visitors' image-making would produce a composite whole from myriad points of view. The result was not only a digital version of the installation but also a successful promotional gambit directing traffic to the website and associated media accounts. The curated online exhibition of "A Subtlety" hosted on the website of the nonprofit arts organization Creative Time, produced by the digital entrepreneurs of its subcontractor Makeable, drew together 17,315 of the Instagram contributions, together with 1,788 from Twitter and 83 from Facebook (Creative Time). Highlighting what Walker has sardonically termed the exhibition's "ridiculously romantic angles" (qtd in Sutton), the selections that constitute the official 3D curated exhibition of "A Subtlety" emphasize the sublimity of the sphinx figure and a largely reverential attitude on the part of the audience. Produced through technological, cultural, and cognitive "filtering" processes that conspicuously "remov[e] unwanted content or impurities" (Walker Rettberg 22), this version of the exhibition's online archive is accompanied by a more disturbing obverse, for the exhibition's main claim to fame...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0170.014
Scholarly communication0.0090.006
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCultural Critique→Same topicGender, Feminism, and Media→French-language works237,207→